Carolus Clusius, Exoticorum Libri Decem, 1605ManucodiataAppendix to Ch. I, Lib. V
[p.359]
Quia dum Quintum Exoticorum Librum
scriberem, de Paradiseis avibus et Psittacis agere minimé
constitueram, eum à faedissimae avis historia sum exorsus: libro autem illo jam
typis expresso, quum causae quaedam inciderint, ut sententiam mutarem, primum
illud meum institutum revocare non piguit, et Paradiseás aves praeponere,
quarum historiam primum inter aves locum merito debere habere existimavi atque
proximum post illas, Pisittacos, quorum maxima est varietas.
[MN: Manucodiata Veteribus
ignota]
De Manucodiata igitur, sive eâ ave quae à Paradiso cognomen
accepit, plerique inter Neotericos (veteribus enim ignotam fuisse opinor)
scripserunt: nemo tamen, meâ quidem opinione, exactius, quàm C. V. Ulysses
Aldrovandus. Nam de omnibus rebus, quae ad ejus avis historiam facere possunt,
accuratissimè et subtilissimè disputavit, ac in quinque species distinxit:
totidem enim se observasse scribit. Video autem ipsum, et reliquos omnes qui de
hac ave commentati sunt, in hoc convenire, ut illam pedibus carere judicent,
quia quotquot ipsis fuerunt conspectae, eae
non nisi pedibus mutilae: hinc factum est, ut Antonium Pigafetam, qui cum
Magellano profectus, nave Victoriâ vectus totum orbem primus circuivit,
mendacii et falsitatis arguere, fidemque eius imminuere non sint veriti, quòd è
longâ illâ navigatione redux, huius avis notitiam Europaeis hominibus primus
dedit, et in Navigationis suae Diario, pedes [crura dicere voluit] palmum longos, sed tenues, huic avi tribuerit.
Ego sanè, licet hactenus in eâdem erroneâ opinione cum illis sim versatus, ut
eas aves apodes censuerim (praeter Aristotelis tamen sententiam, qui nullam
avem absque pedibus asserit) quia
quas mihi videre contigerat tum in Hispanica mea peregrinatione Ulysippone
binos menses haerens, tum in Belgio apud diversos qui exoticis hujusmodi rebus
delectantur, omnes sine pedibus erant et exenteratae (tum tamen temporis, ut
verum fatear, minimè curiosus ad observandum an aliquod inter eas esset
discrimen) postremae tamen Batavorum in Indiam navigationes effecerunt, ut sine
difficultate senentiam mutaverim, quum Amstelredamum quasdam integras cruraque
cum pedibus retinentes allatas esse certum sit, et ab iis sui conspexerunt,
intelligebam, crura illa picae variae cruribus admodum esse similiâ, infirmiora
tamen, nec adeò crassa, coloremque habere non atrum, sed ad castaneum
tendentem.
Nihilominus tamen
videre cupiuissem et si unam dumtaxat nancisci licuisset, statim in tabella
exprimendam curassem, ut Lectori spectandam proponerem, et Pigafetae fidem
confirmarem: sed quum illico propter raritatem fuerint redemptae et
Francofurtum ad Moenum translatae, e inde porro una ad Caesarum Rudolphum huius
nominis Secundú (cuius Majestatem his rebus peregrinis, et omnium Naturae
miraculorum cognitione impensé delectari audio) meá spe frustratus sum. Si verò contingat aliquas integras denuò adferri, idque
tempore rescivero, dabo operam ut nancisci possum, vel saltem commodato, ut
ejus iconem exhibere queam, ad convellendam vulgò conceptam de illis avibus
opinionem, quae apodes esse censet.
[MN: Manucodiates
apodes non sunt]
Ceterùm nautas qui has aves retulerant,
licet insulas in quibus ipsae aves nascuntur et vivunt, non adierint, ab illis
tamen à quibus
redimebant, intellexisse mihi affirmatum est, omnes pedibus esse praeditas,
incedereque et volare aliarum avium instar: sed incolas, simulatque eas ceperunt intestina, pedesque
adimere et abiicere, deinde Soli exponere ut facilius arescant, aridas
adservare ut venundent, aut suis cassidibus pennarum loco aptent. Addebant
praeterea eas aves in silvis versari, et triginta vel quadraginta simul per
turmas volare solitas, ipsarum Rege vel Duce comite, qui supra reliquas perpetuò sublimis volat, atque
(quod fabulae proximum) si sitis molesta est, aliquam è caterva primùm ad aquam emitti, explorandi gratiâ; quae si à potu nullam noxam
senserit, tum demum totam catervam advolare et bibere: sin autem morbida
redierit, eam aquam à reliquis deseri, et avolare, aliam inquisituras. Addebant insuper,
insulanos aquam hac ratione solere inficere ad aves captandas. Conspicientes
harum avium aliquam turmam praetervolantem, quo sese conferat, observant, atque
ubi avem missam bibesse et revolasse vident, ilico venenum in eam aquam
iniiciunt, quam dum tota turma gustatum venit, inficitur, et sic praeda sit.
Sed etiam illas aves iterdum sagittis peti solere atque si contingat ipsarum
Regem interfici, illo cadente, reliquas aves, quae in ea turma, simul cadere et
sese comprehendi sinere, tamquam amisso Rege vitam retinere nolentes.
[MN: Manucodiata
duo genere]
Istarum porrò avium duo genera constituebant: Unum Majorum,
quae elegantiores: Alterum Minorum et minùs elegantium. Utrique autem generi suum esse
Regem peculiarem, et colore differentem. Majoris generis aves, quarum Rex
elegantis et venusti coloris,...
[p.360]
...in insula Aru sive Arou (sic enim
vocalis illa a pronuncianda) dumtaxat
reperiri: Minoris verò generis aves insulas Papuas,
insulae Gilolo vicinas producere earumque Regem minus elegantem esse, nigris
pennis praeditum, sturno magnitudine parem, pennasque quasdam habentam setarum
equinarum instar. An verò Rex iste niger, illa species Quarta in C. V. Aldrovando exhibita:
Requisiti autem qui has aves vendebant à nautis, quo nomine apud incolas
appellarentur, responderunt Boëres
vocari hoc est, Aves: omnes enim aves sic nuncupant, nec peculiaribus vocabulis
distinguere norunt.
Ceterum quum Majoris generis avem
elegantissimam et prae reliquis magnam apud C. V. Petrum Pawium Artis Medicae
doctorem et primarium in Academia Lugduno Batava Professorem conspexerim, ejus
iconem in tabella exprimendam curabam ut exhiberem additâ quâ potui fide brevi
historiâ quae primum
quidem locum in Quinto Exoticorum libro meritò obtinere debuerat: sed quum sex priores
libri typis, ut suprà dictum, iam essent expressi in hoc Auctarium, cum quibusdam aliis
quae postera nactus sum, conferendam esse existimavi.
[MN: Manucodiata
maioris genera]
Corpusculi huius avis moles ad hirundinis
magnitudinem proximè accedebat; atque a summo capitis vertice ad ouropygium [ie. uropygium= rump] usque, vix quinque
unciarum longitudinem superabat: capitis vertex à rostro ad oculos et collum, creberrimis
brevibus pennulis sericea stamina imitantibus, tectus erat superna quidem sive
extremâ parte flavi coloris,
infimá a verò qua cuti insertae,
fusci: supina capitis pars inferiori rostri parti contigua, ab oculis ad guttur
usque, brevissimis etiam confertissimisque. staminulis veriùs quàm pennulis serico aequalibus, coloris prorsus atri, obsita: guttur
deinde ad pectus usque similis penitus formae pennulis, vel potiùs staminulis serici
instar ornatum erat, iisque coloris viridis saturi adeò elegantis et splendidi, ut in collo anatis
ferae masculi elegantiores cospici nequeant: pectus tegentes pennae etiam
tenuissimae, sed longiores, valdeque molles, coloris ex atro rufescentis, nihil
nisi sericea stamina videbantur: rostrum illi satis exile et mucronatum, quod
parte capiti proximâ nigricans, extimâ verò quodammodo exalbidum erat, et unciae cum semisse longitudinem
habebat: in capite etiam, rostro vicina apparebant oculorum vestigia valde
parva: dorsi porrò, ventris, et caudae pennae ferrugineum vel ex fusco rufescentem
habebant colorem: ipsaque cauda pennis decem latiusculis sex uncias cum semisse
longis erat praedita, supra quas oblongae duae teretesque pennae, nervis aut sutoriis cerdonum filis quodammodo similes, firmae tamen, ex fusco nigrae,
binorumque pedum et trium aut quatuor unciarum longitudinem habentes ab eodem
exortu quo caudae pennae procedebant ouropygio videlicet conjunctim insertae,
et illae quidem crassiusculae in exortu circa ipsarum tubum à quo ad quatuor unciarum
aut paullo ampliorem longitudinem frequentibus villis tamquam tenuibus
staminibus ab uno latere, ab altero autem ad ternas erant…
[p.361]
...obsitae deinde sensim graciliores fiebant
ad extremum usque, et licet villis illis destitutae asperiusculae tamen erant
tamquam resecti fuissent, si quos habuerant, villi. Pennarum autem quae in alis,
varia erat longitudo: quaedam enim insimae videlicet, quas valdè confertas habebat, sex
unciarum longitudinem non excedebant, imò nonnullae etiam breviores; quaedam octo aut
novem uncias erant longae, aliae duodecim, longissimae autem pedalem cum
semisse longitudinem aequabant: magna etiam in illis colorum varietas; nam
quaedam, auri colore fulgebant; nonnullae, praefertim quae in alarum lateribus
angustiores, colorem habebant ex fusco subrutilum et quasi ex atro sanguineum
attamé splendidum;
quae verò reliquas
tegebant, cineracei ex albo coloris erant, earumque latera rarioribus pilis sive villis obsita; breviter omnes admondum venustae, quas, si
licuisset, in tabella proposita libenter expressas voluissem sed quia adeò confertim natae, commodè id fieri non potuit ne
totius avis forma corrumperetur.
Ejusdem generis deinde conspiciebam apud
Nobilissimum eundemque doctissimum virum Josephum Scaligerum, corporis quidem
mole paullò minorem ut quae uncias quatuor cum semisse à capite ad ouropygium dumtaxat longa esset,
caudae autem pennae eandem cum iam descriptae pennis habebant longitudinem, at teretes
illae longaeque pennae nervis similes, et conjunctim ex ouropygio nascentes,
pedis unius cum dodrante longitudinem non superabant, alioqui circa ipsarum tubum similibus
villis tamquam staminibus ab uno latere ad duarum aut trium unciarum
longitudinem, ab altero autem ad quinque ferè à tubo unciarum longitudinem deinde exiliores etiam fiebant ad
extremum usque, et nonnihil asperae erant praesertim circa extremum, non adeò tamen uti superioris
pennae: earum verò quae in alis varia similiter erat longitudo, quemadmondum in
superiorè, nec ei valde dissimilis, nec etiam diversa colorum varietas, ut aetate dumtaxat discretae fuisse
videantur: pennae praeterea dorsum pectusque tegentes, atque etiam caudae
pennae eundem quem modò descriptae habebant colorem; stamina illa caput, cervicem,
pectusque tegentia à praecedentis staminibus nec colore nec situ differebant; rostrum
verò sescunciam longum, mucronatum non crassum,
aliquâ ex parte fuscum
reliquâ album.
Manucodiata
minoris genere
Aliam porrò apud eundem videbam paullò minore corporis mole et
minus planâ praeditam, valde parvum caput habentem, cujus rostrum aequalis paenè cum praecedente
magnitudinis, magis tamen angustum, et ex caeruleo fusci coloris, binis foraminibus
per quae respirabat parte superiore capiti proximâ praeditum non secus ac in praecedente;
capitis vertex brevissimus villis tamquam sericeis staminibus tectus erat, non
adeò elegantis tamen
coloris ut in praecedente, sed flavi quasi fuligine infecti: praeterea stamina
illa rostrum supremâ parte cingentia, minùs latum spatium occupabant atri tamen etiam erant coloris; quibus verò guttur tectum erat,
viridis erat color et splendens haud secus ac in praecedentibus, sed minimi
digiti latitudinem non superabant: huius dorsum à collo ad ouropygium usque tenuibus quidem
pennis tectum erat, sed alterius quàm praecedentis coloris; nam ex cineraceo flavescebant: pectus verò tegentes pennae, simili
colore erant praeditae, quo praecedentium pennae pectorales; cum iis etiam
conveniebant pennae illae quae partem ouropygio proximam occupabant: cuius
autem coloris furerint caudae pennae, indicare nequeo, quandoquidem ouropygio
carebat, eamque ob causam ignorem an oblongos illos teretesque nervos habuerit,
quibus, quotquot hactenus videre memini fuerunt praeditae: alarum pennae variam
habebant longitudinem, perinde atque in superioribus, nec colore valde erant
dissimiles; quae tamen erant longissimae, et rarioribus villis latera obsita
habebant, multo candidoris erant coloris, quàm suprà memoratarum pennae, sesquipedalemque
habebant longitudinem. An porrò color ille pennarum dorsum tegentium á superioribus diversus discrimen sexus
faciat, quemadmondum nonnulli opinantur, nihil pronunciare possum; è secundo tamen esse
genere, earum videlicet quas Papuae insulae alunt mihi dicebat Ioannes de Weely,
nervisque quidem illis carere, sed non caudâ: eamque ob causam sexus discrimen facere
nequeunt, ut vulgus putat.
Ceterum Leydensis quidam civis apud Batavos
unam etiam habebat huic postremae Scaligeri prorsus similem, et ouropygio
caudaque etiam mutilatam, tum oblongis illis nervis carentem; quae nota an
singulas illius generis aves ab aliis discerneret, me latebat (quia binas illas
dumtaxat observavi hanc notam habentes, quantum quidem memoriâ teneo, aut si similes
antè videre contigit
mihi excidit quia minùs exactam tum temporis in similium avium formâ observandâ diligentiam adhibebam)
sed, ut paullò ante dicebam, Joannes de Weely omnem dubitationem ademit.
Porrò quum haec commentatus essem, idem Joannes de
Weely vir perhumanus civis et mercator Amstelredamensis, qui similem avem
pedibus praeditam Caesarae Majestati vendiderat, mihi significabat hoc mense Junio
anni Christi millseimi sexcentesimi
quinti…
p.362
...(praecedente enim Maio ab ipso
requisiveram) Paradiseam illam avem è majorum genere fuisse, quae binos illos nervos ex ouropygio
prodeuntes habent, et planiore sunt corpore, nec adeò orbiculato ut illae quae ex Papuis insulis
advehuntur: pedes autem illi fuisse similes accipitris vel pulli gallinacei
pedibus quidem similes, sed valde foedos et ad ipsius avis corpus compressos,
ut pedum digiti dumtaxat apparerent; seque ejus esse opinionis, omnes
paradiseas aves similibus esse praeditas pedibus, sed incolas ob eorum
foeditatem et inconcinnitatem, eos simul cum cruribus resecare et abiicere.
Illud ipsum sub extremum Junium praesens mihi confirmabat.
Majorum Paradisearum
Aviumsive manucodiatarum majorum Rex creditus
Valde rara erat ea
avicula quam Avium Paradisearum majoris generis Regem appellari intelligebam:
nam tametsi Paradiseas aves saepe, ut antè dicebam, viderim cum Ulyssipone tum aliis
locis, et Batavi naucleri qui singulis annis navigationem in Indiam Orientalem
nunc instituere solent ex sua profectione reduces aliquot ejusmodi aves ferè semper referant; nullum
tamen Regem conspicere mihi contigerat ante annum Christi millesimum
sexcentesimum tertium, Amstelredami videlicet apud quendam mercatorem ejusmodi
res exoticas de nautis reducibus redimere solitum, ut porrò cum magno quaestu aliis
vendat. Anni verò insequentis initio, significabat mihi honestisimus vir Emanuel Swertz
ejusdem urbis civis, similem etiam se habere: itaque ab illo imprimendam curare
possem ejus iconem. Quum verò illius paullò antè meminerim, et nemo hactenus similem quod equidem sciam, exhibuerit,
mei officii esse putavi, ejus historiam additâ iconem hoc loco proponere.
Manucodiata
maioris generis Rex
Erat autem ea avicula aliis Manucodiatis
minor et diversis pennis praedita: nam à capite caudam, duarum unciarum longitudinem
vix superabat: caput illi valde parvum, quod cum rostro unciam cum semisse
dumtaxat longum erat: ipsa cauda eandem longitudinem habebat: alae verò toto aviculae corporae
longè majors, ut quae uncias quatuor cum semisse
prolixae essent, et binas uncias ultra extremam caudam porrigerentur: rostri
color albus, cuius superna pars unciam longa, et brevibus elegantibusque
plumulis sive villis rubri coloris ad mediam usque partem tecta, sericeorum quorundam
staminùm instar, quemadmondum et tota capitis pars anterior; inferior verò rostri pars, unciam
similiter longa, quam tamen aliquantulum superabat prona: media capitis pars
utrimque circa oculos parvas maculas nigras impressas habebat: collum cum
pectore exilibus pennis saturè rubris et quasi sanguinei coloris tectum, ut quodammodo sericeis
etiam staminibus constare viderentur: omnes deinde pennulae dorsum et remiges
alarum pennas caudamque tegentes paenè unius erant coloris: singulae verò alae tredecim pennis remigibus constabant,
pronâ quidem parte
fusci ex rufo coloris, supinâ autem ex flavor fusci: cauda septem aut octo pennis fuscis erat
praedita, quas minùs diligenter distinxit pictor, aut ob pennulas eas tegentes,
distinctas exprimere non potuit: supine porrò corporis pars sub pectore, veluti torque
minimum ferè digitum lato insignita erat, atris plumulis tamquam sericeis
staminibus constante: pennae ventrem tegentes albae erant, sed quae alis
proximae, nigrae, et earum quinque aut sex in singulis lateribus paullò longiores: binas
videlicet uncias aequabant, atque in latiorem extremitatem viridi
elegantissimoque et splendente haud secus ac anatis ferae masculi collum,
praeditam, desinebant. Ex ouropygio autem inter caudae pennas binae prodibant…
[p.363]
...veluti setae equinae, tenues firmae tamen,
septem aut octo uncias longae, et illae quidem prorsus nigrae, sed quarum
extremitates ad unciae longitudinem in orbem convolutae erant, ab uno dumtaxat
latere tenuissimis villis praeditae, qui pronâ parte coloris viridis saturi splendentis et
elegantis, paenè instar pennularum quae anatis ferae maris collum tegunt, magnam sanè venustatem toto aviculae
corpori addentes; supina verò earum pars fusci coloris erat. Intelligebam etiam quosdam esse
conspectos, qui setas illas haberent alteram super alterâ versus extremum
decussatim sitas.
---
Notes on names:
Antonium Pigafetam =
Antonio Pigafetta, Italian, (c.1491 – c. 1531), the ship's chronicler on
Magellan's first voyage around the world that returned in 1522, bringing the
first bird of paradise specimens to Europe.
Ulysses Aldrovandus = Ulysse Aldrovandi (1522-1605), a wealthy and
well known Bolognese collector-naturalist.
Caesarum Rudolphum = Rudolf II, Holy Roman
Emperor, (1552-1612) who had one of the most extensive collections in his time
in Prague.
Petrum Pawium = Pieter Pauw/ Peter Pavius,
(1564-1612), Dutch botanist and professor at Leiden University with Clusius,
and had a collection of naturalia.
----
Carolus Clusius, Exoticorum Libri Decem, 1605Manucodiata, Appendix to Ch. I, Lib. V
[p.359]
Because when I wrote the fifth book concerning
exotic things, I had resolved not to deal with paradisial birds and parrots, I
started with a history of the foulest birds: having this book already with the
type set, something happened to make me change my opinion; I did not hesitate
to revoke my original decision, and to place the birds of paradise first,
the account of which I reckoned deserved first place amongst birds, and
immediately after them, the parrots, of which there is a great variety.
Margin
note:[The manucodiata unknown to the ancients,]
For concerning the Manucodiata, that takes its name from paradise,
for of all the many of the moderns (for I think that they were unknown to the
ancients), have written: but no-one however, in my opinion, more precisely,
than C.V [Clarissimus vir] Ulysse Aldrovandi. For concerning all things of
which to make a history of this bird he most accurately and exactly discussed,
and he distinguished 5 species: for he wrote that he had observed that number.
But I see that he and all the rest who have talked about this bird agree in
this thing, that they judge it to lack feet, because however many had been seen by them, none were without mangled feet: hence it came
about that Antonio Pigafetta, who set out with Magellan, who sailed around the
entire globe carried in the ship Victoria, they were not afraid to accuse
Pigafetta of lying and falsehood, because returning from that long journey he
first brought news of this bird to European people, an in the diary of his
voyage he attributed to this bird, by which he meant to say legs, a palm long,
but thin. I myself , granted that I held those erroneous opinions, and I
judged those birds to be legless (despite the opinion of Aristotle, who
asserts that no bird is without feet), those which I saw on my journeys around
Spain, staying in Lisbon for two months, and next in Belgium who delighted in
this kind of exotic thing, all were without any feet and gutted. (but at that
time, to tell the truth, I was not in the least interested to observe whether
there was any difference between them) but after the latest voyages in Batavia
in the Indies caused, that I changed my opinion without difficulty, when it was
certain that certain whole ones retaining feet with legs had been brought to
Amsterdam, and I understood from those who had seen them, that those legs were
quite similar to the legs of various magpies, but weaker nor so thing, and they
had a colour not black, but tending towards chestnut. I wanted to see also if I
should be allowed to acquire at least one immediately, I would take care to put
it in a plate so that I could offer it to the reader to see and to confirm the
truthfulness of Pigafetta: but immediately because of their rarity they were
purchased and carried to Frankfurt on the Moen, furthermore, one was carried to
Kaiser Rudolf II, (whose Majesty I hear is immensely delighted by these
foreign things, and by the knowledge of the wonders of Nature) I was
frustrated in my hope. If indeed it should happen that other whole one should
be brought and I find out about it in time, I will make the effort to acquire
one, or at least a loan, so that I may be able to show its image so as to wreck
the commonly held opinion concerning these birds that holds them to be
footless. Besides, I am assured that the sailors who brought back these words,
though they have not visited the islands in which those birds are born and
live, understood, from whom they purchased them, that all are endowed with
feet, and walk fly like other birds: but the inhabitants, as soon as they
capture them, remove and throw away the feet and the guts, then expose to the
sun to dry them up more easily, they
preserve them dry to offer them for sale, or fix them to mens’ helmets in place
of the plumes. These birds wander around forests, and they are accustomed to
fly in groups of 30 or 40 with their king or leader accompany them, and the
king flies above the others. And it was said that if the leader (as the fable
says) that if thirst is troublesome, that one bird from the flock is sent first
to the water in order to explore: Which if in drinking, it feels no harm, then
the whole flock flies together and drinks: if however, it should return ill,
that body of water is left by the others and they fly away, in order to look
for another one. For this reason, the islanders are accustomed to poison the
water in order to capture birds. Seeing one of these birds flying by, they
decide in what way the flock gathers, and when they see the taster bird has
drunk and flown back, immediately they throw the poison in the water, which
while all the flock comes and tastes, it is poisoned, and thus is preyed upon. But
also, that they are accustomed to seek/hunt those birds sometimes with arrows,
and if it happens that their king is killed, when he falls, the rest of the
birds in that flock come down to the ground together at once and allow
themselves to be taken, as if, without their king, they do not wish to stay
alive.
People recognize two kinds of these birds: one of the bigger ones
which are more handsome, one of the little ones that are less handsome. But
each race has a particular king, each of a different colour. The Major type of
birds, of which the King is of an elegant and attractive colour,
[p.360] in the Island of Aru or Arou (for the vowel 'u' is pronounced) are only
found there: but the smaller kind come from islands Papua, next to the island Gilolo, and their king is less handsome,
endowed with black feathers, the size of a starling, and having some feathers
like the bristles of horses. If indeed the king is black, it may be the 4th
species presented in C.V. Aldrovandi's [work]: When the inhabitants who sell
these birds were asked what name they give these birds by sailors, they
responded that they were Boeres, Birds: a name for all birds, nor is
there a particular word to distinguish these.
Besides, when I got sight of a very elegant bird of the larger kind
at the house of C.V Pieter Pauw, Doctor of Medicine and foremost professor at
the in the University of Leiden in Batavia, whose form I took care to display
in a plate, so that I should show it with a short history added, as faithfully
as I was able, which should in fact by rights have had first place, in the 5th
book of exotica: but since six book already printed as mentioned above were put
into print, an appendix, with certain others which I found out about later, I
judged fit to be included.
The mass of the little body of this bird approaches very close to
the size of a swallow, and from the crown of its head to its rump, it scarcely
exceeds 5 inches long: from the beak to the top of the head around the eyes and
neck are covered thick with short feathers like silk threads, the top or
furthest side indeed was of a yellow colour, but the underneath where inserted
into the skin, dusky: the lower part of the head next to the lower part of the
rostrum, up to the eyes to the throat,
is also dotted with shortest and densest
threadlets almost black in colour, rather than little feathers,
From the throat right up to the breast the feathers resemble the
form of featherlets, or rather as if decorated with silken threads, those being
saturated with green colour so elegant and splendid, as in the throat of a wild
male duck, that no more elegant can be seen; the feathers covering the breast
are very fine, but long and very soft, coloured dark rufus, looking like
nothing so much as silken thread: the beak is sufficiently feeble, and pointed,
which in the part next to the head is blackish, but the furthest edge was
whitish, it was an inch and a half long: in the head next to the beak appear
the very small traces of eyes: moving on, the feathers of the back and the
stomach and the tail had a colour on the reddish side of dusky: the tail itself
was furnished with 10 feathers six and a half inches long, upon which two
smooth long feathers, like the thread or cord of a shoemaker, yet strong, of a
very dark black, having a length of two foot and three of four inches, from the
same origin from which the tail feathers emerge, jointly inserted into the
rump, and those [two cords], indeed, rather thick at the origin around the shaft,
they were studded up to a length of four inches or more with dense featherlets,
...
[p.361]
... like thin slender
hairs, on one side, and on the other to about three inches, but they became
gradually thinner towards the end, and though they were destitute of those
hairs, they were however roughish, as if the hairs, if they had had any, had
been cut back. Of the wing feathers however, which have various lengths: some
of them indeed, the lower ones to whit, being crammed together, did not exceed six
inches of length, nay rather, some were even shorter, some were eight or nine
inches long, others, 12, the longest moreover were a foot and a half long: and
great was the variety of colours among them; for some shone with a golden
colour; some had a colour as if from blood red from black, but yet, however,
splendid; those that cover the rest are ashen, and going from off-white to ash,
the sides of them are sparsely studded with hairs; in short, they are all
absolutely lovely, which if I had been able, I willingly would have liked to
express more clearly in the proposed plates, [yet] because they were growing so
crammed together, but it was not conveniently possible, lest the shape of the
whole bird should suffer.
Then one of the same kind I saw at the house of the most noble and
learned man Joseph Scaliger, the size of its body was somewhat smaller that is,
and at most four inches and a half long from the head to the rump, the feathers
of the tail moreover had the same length as the feathers just described, and those
smooth and long feathers like strings and growing together from the rump did
not exceed a length of one foot and three quarters....